ACCIS statement on several CJEU cases
In this statement, we outline our views on several CJEU cases that can shape the regulatory framework for the provision of credit referencing services in the internal EU market. In our opinion, cross-border access to credit databases will only be meaningful if the...
ACCIS response to EDPB’s Guidelines on calculation of fines
In our response to the EDPB’s Guidelines on calculation of fines, we note that the EDPB appears to emphasise setting GDPR fines at a level that effectively deters future non-compliance whilst we would prefer similar attention to ensuring the proportionality of GDPR...
ACCIS feedback on the European Commission’s proposal on the EU Data Act
In our feedback document on the proposed EU Data Act, ACCIS broadly welcomes the EU Data Act as it creates a fairer, more innovative, and more competitive data economy in Europe. We are however unclear as to the stated harmonising objective of the Regulation. The GDPR...
ACCIS feedback on a proposal establishing a European Single Access Point
In our response, we highlight that the proposal offering a single point of access to public information about EU companies and EU investment products could potentially allow ACCIS members to retrieve and process data which is used for added value services (e.g.,...
ACCIS response to EDPB’s Guidelines 01/2022 on Data Subject Rights – Right of Access
In our response to the EDPB’s Guidelines 01/2022 on Data Subject Rights – Right of Access, we highlight several positive elements in how the EDPB guides in relation to the form of Data Subject Access Requests (DSARs), the provision of a copy or the limits to respond...