In this response, we express concerns about perceived imbalances in GDPR enforcement. We also note that the absence of clear guidance exacerbates the situation, especially in cases where the GDPR falls short in providing necessary clarity. Members of ACCIS assert that...

In this statement, we outline our views on several CJEU cases that can shape the regulatory framework for the provision of credit referencing services in the internal EU market. In our opinion, cross-border access to credit databases will only be meaningful if the...

In our response to the EDPB’s Guidelines on calculation of fines, we note that the EDPB appears to emphasise setting GDPR fines at a level that effectively deters future non-compliance whilst we would prefer similar attention to ensuring the proportionality of GDPR...

In our feedback document on the proposed EU Data Act, ACCIS broadly welcomes the EU Data Act as it creates a fairer, more innovative, and more competitive data economy in Europe. We are however unclear as to the stated harmonising objective of the Regulation. The GDPR...

In our response, we highlight that the proposal offering a single point of access to public information about EU companies and EU investment products could potentially allow ACCIS members to retrieve and process data which is used for added value services (e.g.,...